Legal Opinion · Dissent

Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 28, 1936No. 2Published

1DissentLayton, C. J.

(dissenting) : I regret that I am unable to agree that the judgment should be affirmed for two reasons.

*65The first assignment of error is based upon the overruling of an objection to a question put to the witness, Porter, “Did you not write to Mr. Richards under the date of January first, 1934, ‘We of course always assumed that as you stated you came to us from Lord Shaughnessy who was your friend. You would look to him for any commission you might feel you were entitled to’ ?”

The third assignment was based upon the ruling of the court that the letter, of which the language of the question was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The People v. . GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. FoxTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  3. In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of EysamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. Green & Flinn, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API