Legal Opinion
Tsatsakos v. Citicorp
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 17, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated February 14, 2001, as granted that branch of the motion of the third-party defendants, in which the defendants third-party plaintiffs joined, which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Stefanos Tsatsakos (hereinafter Tsatsakos) and a coworker, window washers, were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Nieves v. Five Boro Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bradley v. Morgan Stanley & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Santoro v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Kajo v. E.W. Howell Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Weekes v. Tishman Tech. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025