Legal Opinion
Santoro v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 24, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated September 21, 2001, as denied their motion for summary judgment on their Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, and granted those branches of the separate cross motions of the defendant New York City Transit Authority, the defendant third-party plaintiff, General Railway Signal Corporation, and the third-party defendant, Mass Electric Construction Company, which were, for summary judgment dismissing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Nieves v. Five Boro Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bond v. York Hunter Construction, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Tillman v. Triou's Custom Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Dilluvio v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Amantia v. Barden & Robeson Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Palumbo v. Transit Technologies, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Amaxes v. Newmark & Co. Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Corsino v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007