Legal Opinion
Kum Tat Limited v. Linden Ox Pasture, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 13, 2017No. 14-17472PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Circuit Judge:
Kum Tat Limited (“Kum Tat”) moved to compel arbitration of a claim against Linden Ox Pasture, LLC (“Linden Ox”), in connection with an attempted purchase of a California residence. The arbitration motion relied only on state law, and Kum Tat later emphasized that the motion was not filed pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16. The district court denied the motion, and Kum Tat filed this interlocutory appeal, invoking appellate jurisdiction under the FAA. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
A. Contract negotiations
In…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Three Valleys Municipal Water District v. E.F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Margaret Palcko v. Airborne Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Paula Blair v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Robert Ahlstrom v. Dhi Mortgage Co., Ltd. LpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Galilea, LLC v. AGCS Marine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Drickey Jackson v. AmznCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Lulac v. Andrew WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.