State v. Mertens
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
RCW 77.15.500 establishes the elements of commercial fishing without a license while former RCW *82377.15.110(1) (1998), amended by Laws of 2002, ch. 127, § 2, listed conduct that constituted “acting for commercial purposes,” an element of the crime. At issue in this case is whether the statutory scheme created an unconstitutional irrebuttable presumption by requiring a fact finder to presume commercial intent from possession of more than three times the personal bag limit of geoducks. We recognize that former RCW 77.15.110(1) provided a technical definition of the “acting for commercial purposes”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Island County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BashWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. YishmaelWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- In Re Detention of BrockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. BergenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.