Legal Opinion

State v. Mertens

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2003No. 72081-9PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

RCW 77.15.500 establishes the elements of commercial fishing without a license while former RCW *82377.15.110(1) (1998), amended by Laws of 2002, ch. 127, § 2, listed conduct that constituted “acting for commercial purposes,” an element of the crime. At issue in this case is whether the statutory scheme created an unconstitutional irrebuttable presumption by requiring a fact finder to presume commercial intent from possession of more than three times the personal bag limit of geoducks. We recognize that former RCW 77.15.110(1) provided a technical definition of the “acting for commercial purposes”…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Island County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. BashWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. YishmaelWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  2. In Re Detention of BrockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. State v. BergenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. State v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API