Legal Opinion

Amachee v. Mohammed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

When a party moves pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a verdict as unsupported by legally sufficient evidence and for judgment as a matter of law, the court must determine “whether There is simply no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational [people] to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented at trial’ ” (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 48-49 [1994], quoting Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]; see Raugalas v Chase Manhattan Corp., 305 AD2d 654, 655 [2003]). Here, there was adequate evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Mirand v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Alexander v. EldredNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Campos v. OfmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Lauria v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Powell v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Perez v. 2246 Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API