Legal Opinion

Bunnell v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1918No. 8992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Yuma District Court, Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen:

ON March 5, 1915, Holmes and McGinnis, plaintiffs below, commenced an action against Bunnell, defendant below, to quiet title to certain real estate. Bunnell was a non-resident, and service was had upon him by publication. The last publication of summons was upon May 27, 1915.

The default of the defendant was entered on October 16, 1915, which was over three months after it could have been entered. On the same day a hearing was had, and judgment given for plaintiffs.

On November 1, 1915, the defendant filed a motion to set aside the default judgment. On April 27,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. CollisMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Wallace v. HeitlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. Fullen v. WunderlichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  4. Parker v. MaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of GrimesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Nielson v. ScottColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Diebold v. DieboldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  4. Hille v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  5. Carpenter-Liebhardt Fruit Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API