United States Ex Rel. Kirsch v. Armfield
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZIEGLER, Chief Judge.
Pending before the court is the motion (doc. no. 59) of plaintiff, the United States, to dismiss defendants’ counterclaim for setoff for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). The United States contends that the court lacks jurisdiction over the claim because, as a jurisdictional prerequisite, defendants have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies with the Health Care Financing Administration (“HCFA”), an agency of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), and HHS. Defendants…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.