Legal Opinion

Bailey-Allen Co., Inc. v. Kurzet

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 18, 1997No. 960839-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Presiding Judge:

This case is before us for the second time on appeal. See Bailey-Alien Co., Inc. v. Kurzet, 876 P.2d 421 (Utah Ct.App.1994) (Bailey-Alien I). This time around, the Kurzets challenge the trial court’s Amended Findings of Fact (Amended Findings) and Conclusions of Law (Amended Conclusions) entered pursuant to remand. In addition, the Kurzets raise a postjudgment interest question regarding the trial court’s original judgment and challenge the trial court’s failure to impose sanctions on Bailey-Alien.

BACKGROUND

The factual history of this case is outlined in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Thurston v. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Davies v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. R & R Energies v. Mother Earth Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Union Bank v. SwensonUtah Supreme Court · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Columbia HCA v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  2. Thatcher v. LangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  3. Heartwood Home v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. Naimie v. Cytozyme Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. 4447 Associates v. First Security FinancialCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API