Legal Opinion
Naimie v. Cytozyme Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 8, 1999No. 97-4129, 97-4147PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants Cytozyme Laboratories, Inc. and Cytozyme Research Company (collectively “Cytozyme”) appeal from the district court’s judgment awarding Dr. Naimie damages pursuant to two contracts existing between the parties. Dr. Naimie cross-appeals the district court’s calculation of damages. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
I. Background
Cytozyme manufactures and markets nutritional plant and animal growth enhancement products. In late 1980, Cyto-zyme’s president and chief financial officer, Mr. Steve Baughman, asked Dr. Naimie, a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Consarc Corporation v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thomas v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Huebbe v. Oklahoma Casting Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Hussein Naimie v. Cytozyme Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999