Legal Opinion

Schlenger v. Conti

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 29, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

47 N.J. Super. 566 (1957)

136 A.2d 440

HERMAN SCHLENGER AND RUTH SCHLENGER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

RICHARD CONTI, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 25, 1957.

Decided November 29, 1957.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Charles V. Webb, Jr., argued the cause for appellant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (Messrs. Minard, Cooper, Gaffey & Webb, attorneys; Mr. John J. Gaffey, of counsel).

Mr. Harry V. Osborne, Jr., argued the cause for respondents Schlenger (Messrs. Osborne, Cornish & Scheck, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Giles v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Szczesny v. VasquezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Brookins v. MurraySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Lindsay v. BolesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Parrot v. ChiselkoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. Russo v. ForrestNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API