Legal Opinion

United States v. Patrick Carney (03-1735) Sean Carney (03-1736)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 8, 2004No. 03-1735, 03-1736PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J., joined by Ryan, J.,

COLE, J. (pp. 453-56), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

OPINION

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

The defendants-appellants Patrick Carney (“Patrick”) and Sean Carney (“Sean”), father and son respectively (collectively “the Carneys” or “the defendants”), both federally-licensed firearms dealers, have assailed their correlative jury convictions for multiple counts of (1) aiding and abetting the felonious utterance of knowingly false statements by customers in the defendants’ firearms transfer records (18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(1)(A)),1 and (2) the felonious creation or maintenance of willful omissions…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Lynn Michael LaVictorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Alston-Graves, LoisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Kevin AsherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API