Legal Opinion
Eugster v. City of Spokane
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 22, 2005No. 22761-8-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*3¶1 When a vacancy opened on the Spokane City Council (Council), Rob Higgins, the Council President, circulated a memorandum detailing a proposal for a selection procedure. At one public meeting, Mr. Higgins asked for comments from the Council. At a second public meeting, Mr. Higgins explained the selection procedure, and then assumed that the Council agreed with his proposal because there were no objections to the proposal. Council member Stephen Eugster objected to the informal process used to adopt the selection procedure, and filed this action alleging a violation of the Open Public…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wood v. Battle Ground School Dist.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Wood v. Battle Ground School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Cathcart v. AndersenWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arthur West v. Seattle Port CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- West v. STATE, ASS'N OF COUNTY OFFICIALSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- West v. Washington Ass'n of County OfficialsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Blackman v. Omak School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005