Legal Opinion

City of Jackson v. Willett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

To the suit of the city, brought December 20, 1940, to collect seven unpaid installments of abutting paving taxes, assessed under an ordinance enacted in 1924, pursuant to Chapter 18 of the Acts of 1913, First Extra Session, as amended by Chapter 526, Acts (Private) of 1921, the defendant plead the ten-year Statute of Limitations. Code 1932, sec. 8601. The assessment was made payable in ten installments of $36.90 each, one falling due December 20', 1925, and one each December 20th thereafter, all bearing interest at 6 percent per annum. The first three maturing were paid. The first due was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. HaywardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. Mayor of Morristown v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. City of Lexington v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  4. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. ChanowskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawman v. BarnettTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Lafayette v. Marks Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. City of Salisbury v. AreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. City of Knoxville v. KeithTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Salisbury v. . AreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API