Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stone v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 12853Published

1Dissent

LANGDON, J., Dissenting.

I dissent. The effect of the majority opinion is to disregard settled principles of law and to overrule many well-considered eases. It has been held on numerous occasions by this court, as well as by the District Court of Appeal, that rescission is complete upon the giving of notice and the offer to restore the consideration received. The decisions are reviewed in McNeese v. McNeese, 190 Cal. 402 [213 Pac. 36, 37], where Mr. Justice Lennon says (p. 404) : “The interposition of a court of equity to set the contract aside was not necessary to rescission. A contract may…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Hayes v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API