Legal Opinion
Ottenhouse v. Paysinger
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 12, 1951No. 12344PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
The question presented by this case is whether or not the will of William Otten-house, deceased, required an election on the part of his wife, Kate Ottenhouse, to take under the will or receive 'her one-half of the community estate.
W. H. Paysinger, independent executor of the estate of Kate Ottenhouse, instituted this suit for the purpose of securing a construction of the will of William Ottenhouse. The San Antonio Loan and Trust Company was designated as executor and trustee under the will and Mrs. Kate Ottenhouse had authorized the trust company to handle her property…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Avery v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1917
- Sailer v. FurcheTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Crosson v. DwyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Hocker v. PiperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Ford v. BachmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Winkler v. PitreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Hubbard v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Hubbard v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Milton J. Grossman, Independent of the Estate of James A. Stavely, Deceased v. Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Milton J. Grossman, Independent of the Estate of James A. Stavely, Deceased v. Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966