Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. Schuck
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
If an insurer pays no-fault benefits to an uninsured owner/occupant of a motor vehicle pursuant to an assigned claim, may the insurer thereafter recover such payments in an action filed against the same, uninsured owner/occupant under Section 501 of the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act? 1 The trial court held that there could be no recovery and sustained preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to the insurer’s complaint. We reverse.
Jean Miklavic Schuck, the defendant-appellee, was injured when the vehicle which she owned and which she was operating…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Johnson v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Ostronic v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Brown v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.