Legal Opinion

Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. Schuck

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 1982No. 726PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

If an insurer pays no-fault benefits to an uninsured owner/occupant of a motor vehicle pursuant to an assigned claim, may the insurer thereafter recover such payments in an action filed against the same, uninsured owner/occupant under Section 501 of the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act? 1 The trial court held that there could be no recovery and sustained preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to the insurer’s complaint. We reverse.

Jean Miklavic Schuck, the defendant-appellee, was injured when the vehicle which she owned and which she was operating…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. State v. PotterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. Johnson v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Ostronic v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Brown v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API