Legal Opinion

Steiner v. Spencer

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 11, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

This suit was instituted by the plaintiff, H. L. Spencer, to recover damages for injuries arising from an occupational or industrial disease — -lead poisoning, contracted while in the employ of the Cumberland Battery Company, as a result of its negligence.

The Cumberland Battery Company manufactures storage batteries for automobiles, in which lead plates are used. In the preparation of the plates dust is raised which contains fine particles of lead. Their plant was not equipped with suction fans, etc. The plaintiff, Spencer, contracted lead poisoning while an employee.

The declaration contained…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Queen v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Wagner v. H. W. Jayne Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Smith v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bellamy v. Federal Express Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Stanbury v. BacardiTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Frazor v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  4. Paul Wm. Polin and Marsha Polin v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  5. Housh v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API