Paul Wm. Polin and Marsha Polin v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The judgment in this case was entered pursuant to the granting of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment based on the trial court’s conclusion that the entire action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. A corollary ruling was that plaintiff was not entitled to amend the complaint to add a later transaction. The court reasoned that this latter claim was also barred by the statute of limitations. Thus, we must review, first, the ruling that plaintiff was not entitled to amend and, secondly, whether the statute of limitations had run on one or…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marlowe v. Fisher BodyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- The Travelers Indemnity Company v. United States of America for the Use of Construction Specialties CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Sadowski v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Gilles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Mountain View Pharmacy v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Willis Ray Triplett v. Leflore County, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Leaseamerica Corporation v. Richard Lee Eckel and Lois Thelma Eckel D/B/A Whispering Downs Arena & Turf ClubCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.