Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 12, 2000No. 3161PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

After a careful consideration of the Petition for Rehearing, the Court is unable to discover that any material fact or principle of law has been either overlooked or disregarded and, hence, there is no basis for granting a rehearing. It is, therefore, ordered that the Petition for Rehearing be denied. However, Opinion Number 3161, filed May 8, 2000, is withdrawn and the attached opinion is substituted.

STILWELL, Judge:

In this declaratory judgment action, Keith Gordon contends the special referee erred in determining that James Hanley did not have personal…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Hofer v. St. ClairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Unisun Insurance v. Hertz Rental Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Harris v. Criterion InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  5. Maddux Supply Co., Inc. v. Safhi, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pope v. GordonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'n v. Marshland Trust, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Temple v. Tec-Fab, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Companion Property Ins. v. Airborne Exp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Corbin v. CarlinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API