Koechl v. Leibinger & Oehm Brewing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Victor Koechl, from an order-of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 10th day of February, 1898, denying the plaintiff’s motion to continue an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
■ The defendant Leibinger & Oehm Brewing Company is a domestic corporation. Heretofore, and on the 19th day of May, 1897, it. made and executed a general assignment, without preferences, for the benefit of its creditors, and the assignee therein named entered upon the discharge of his trust. Subsequent to his qualifying as assignee, he presented a petition to the Supreme Court asking leave to sell at public auction the whole of the assigned property. An order authorizing him so to do was made by the court, and the property was sold for the sum of $55,000. The plaintiff is a judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Toof v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Edmeston v. LydeNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
- First National Bank v. . ShulerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Brown v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Continental Oil Co. v. American Co-op. Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Stetson v. HopperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Creteau v. Foote & Thorne Glass Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Hubbard v. United Wireless Telegraph Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.