v. Delage — Searches and Seizures —Consent —Voluntariness
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE HART delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 This case presents us the opportunity to clarify whether the voluntariness of consent to a search in Colorado must be proven by "clear and convincing evidence" or by "a preponderance of the evidence." Under federal law, the answer is clear, as the United States Supreme Court explained more than *1179 forty years ago that voluntariness need only be shown by a preponderance of the evidence. We hold today that in Colorado courts the same standard applies and that the People must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a search was consented to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. GarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Title, Ballot Title and Submission Clause for 2019-2020 3Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Uribe-Sanchez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013