Legal Opinion
Speed Shore Corp. v. Denda
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 1, 1979No. Nos. 77-3487, 78-1607PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Speed Shore Corporation brought two separate actions — one in California and one in Arizona — for infringement of the Brunton patent.1 In both actions, the defendants admitted infringement if the patent was determined to be valid and not misused. In addition, the parties in each action agreed that whichever one of the cases was tried first would determine the liability in the other. On July 11, 1977, the Honorable William P. Gray, District Judge for the Central District of California, ruled that the Brunton patent was valid, infringed, and not misused. A…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Williams v. First Nat. Bank of Pauls ValleySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Photo Electronics Corporation v. John M. England, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Ferrex Corporation, Photo Electronics Corporation v. Ferrex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Schnading Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Waits v. WellerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Velo-Bind, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Manufacturing Research Corp. v. Graybar Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Robert Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp., William A. Werner, and Wer-Nel Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.