Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Woodard

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1908No. L.A. No. 1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County fixing a collateral inheritance tax, and from an order distributing the estate of a deceased person. N. H. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.—This

is an appeal by George F. Schwartz, as county treasurer of the county of San Diego, from two orders of the superior court, one settling the final account of the administrator with the will annexed of the estate of deceased, and the other decreeing final distribution. No brief on behalf of respondent has been filed. Under the will of deceased, his brother was entitled to the whole estate, and the sole question presented by counsel for the appellant is, to what act of the legislature must we look to determine the amount of collateral inheritance tax to be paid by those succeeding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Trippet v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hunt v. WichtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Gregory v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Estate of DargieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API