Taylor v. Fuqua
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Audrain County.— Eon. Samuel Davis, Judge. (1) The respondent is not the legal owner and holder of the notes in suit and, therefore, cannot maintain this action. Section 1112, R. S. 1909 ; Laws of Mo. 1915, page 146, sec. 90; Bank v. Sloop et ah, 200 S. W. 72; Bank v. Lyons, 220 Mo. 554; Bank v. Bank, 244 Mo. 580, 599; Hume v. Eagon, 83 Mo. App. 583; Vansandt v, Hobbs, 84 Mo. App. 632; Powers v. Woolfolk, 132 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Audrain County.— Eon. Samuel Davis, Judge. (1) The respondent is not the legal owner and holder of the notes in suit and, therefore, cannot maintain this action. Section 1112, R. S. 1909 ; Laws of Mo. 1915, page 146, sec. 90; Bank v. Sloop et ah, 200 S. W. 72; Bank v. Lyons, 220 Mo. 554; Bank v. Bank, 244 Mo. 580, 599; Hume v. Eagon, 83 Mo. App. 583; Vansandt v, Hobbs, 84 Mo. App. 632; Powers v. Woolfolk, 132 Mo. App. 363; Miles v. Bank, 187 Mo. App. 238; Musgrove v. Bank, 187 Mo. App. 492. (2) The notes sued on were not admitted nor even offered in evidence,…
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The record herein discloses that early in 1913, defendant, R. E. Fuqua, son of defendant J. Gr. Fuqua, rented from plaintiff certain lands (the transaction being conducted^ it is said, with plaintiff’s husband) ; and that two notes, each of date February 10, 1913, were executed by said R. E. Fuqua and delivered to plaintiff for the amount of said rents. One of these notes was for the sum of $400, due 319 days after date, and the other was for the sum of $125, due 166 days after date. Both hear the names of R E. Fuqua and J. Gr. Fuqua, as makers; the latter, however, denies that he executed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Third National Bank v. St. Charles Savings BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Union National Bank v. LyonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Carter v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- Vansandt v. HobbsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
- Powers v. WoolfolkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stover Bank v. WelpmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Welker v. HayesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
- Moseley v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
- Cowles v. WellsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
- Sedgwick v. National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.