Legal Opinion

National Water-Works Co. v. City of Kansas

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

Decided October 22, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Action for Damages. Demurrer to petition.

1Opinion of the CourtBbewek, J.

This is an action for damages. The plaintiff is the owner of the Kansas City Water-works, and the facts upon which the claim is founded are these: In 1883 plaintiff laid a water-pipe on East Eighth street. This was a street whose grade had been established, and the plaintiff was directed by the city to lay a water-pipe therein, and the’same was laid, in the place and maimer directed by the city. In the year 1884 the city dug a sewer on said *922Eighth street, in the same part of the street in which the plaintiff’s water-pipe had been laid, in consequence whereof the plaintiff was compelled to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Public Water Supply Dist. No. 2 v. State Highway Com'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. New Orleans Gaslight Co. v. Drainage CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  4. Indiana ex rel. City of Muncie v. Lake Erie & W. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1897
  5. Portland Gas & Coke Co. v. GiebischOregon Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API