Young v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of burglary. There is no statement of facts.
The first part of the indictmen was regular. Then it averred that on or about February 28, 19Í7, in said county appellant “did then and there unlawfully in the daytime and at night, by force, threats and fraud break and enter a house there situate and owned by John Handley” without the consent, etc., of the said Handley and with the intent, etc., to steal. The latter part of the indictment charging the intent to steal is in regular form and clearly sufficient. Ho point is attempted to be made against it.
Appe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Millner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Millner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Odneal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Randolph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Parrish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934