Legal Opinion

Millner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1914No. 3200PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bee. Tried below before the Hon. F. G. Chambliss. Appeal from a conviction of murder; penalty, twenty years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

This is the second appeal in this case, the opinion on the former appeal being reported in 72 Tex.Crim. Rep., 162 S.W. Rep., 348. On this trial appellant was again convicted of being an accomplice to the murder, and his punishment assessed at twenty years confinement in the State penitentiary.

The evidence in the case is fully stated in the opinion of Presiding Judge Prendergast, and the concurring opinion of Judge Davidson on the former appeal, therefore we do not deem it necessary to restate the facts. Sufficient to say that the evidence for the State showed that appellant was criminally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Whorton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Millner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Wyres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sam Hoover v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Sapp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Hatfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API