Diamond Game Enterprises, Inc. v. Reno
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to determine whether a gambling machine known as the Lucky Tab II, an electromechanical device that dispenses paper pull-tabs and then displays their contents on a video monitor, should be classified under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act as a Class II “aid” or a Class III “facsimile.” The Act prohibits Indian tribes from operating Class III facsimiles without first negotiating a compact with the state. Applying the statute’s plain language, guided by our only relevant precedent, Cabazon Band Mission…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sycuan Band of Mission Indians v. RoacheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Everett, Frank E. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Diamond Game Enterprises, Inc. v. RenoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
3Cited by16 opinions
- TOMAC v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. National Indian Gaming CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- City of Roseville v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. United States Attorney for the Western District of MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.