Legal Opinion

Diamond Game Enterprises, Inc. v. Reno

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 3, 2000No. 98-5516 & 99-5345PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

This case requires us to determine whether a gambling machine known as the Lucky Tab II, an electromechanical device that dispenses paper pull-tabs and then displays their contents on a video monitor, should be classified under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act as a Class II “aid” or a Class III “facsimile.” The Act prohibits Indian tribes from operating Class III facsimiles without first negotiating a compact with the state. Applying the statute’s plain language, guided by our only relevant precedent, Cabazon Band Mission…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sycuan Band of Mission Indians v. RoacheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Everett, Frank E. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. Diamond Game Enterprises, Inc. v. RenoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. TOMAC v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  2. Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. National Indian Gaming CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. City of Roseville v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  5. Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. United States Attorney for the Western District of MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API