Legal Opinion

Myers v. Halligan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1917No. 2869PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from tire District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Western District of Washington; Edward E. Cushman, Judge. Habeas corpus by Charles Myers against O. P. Halligan, Warden, and another. Erom an adverse judgment, petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

On November 21, 1914, the petitioner herein was brought before a United States commissioner for trial, on a charge of obtaining money under fálse pretenses, and, having entered a plea of insanity, the trial proceeded. The jury impaneled in the cause found that Myers was insane at the time, and he was ac*421cordingly committed to the Morningside Sanitarium, at Portland, Or., on May 6, 1915. He escaped from that institution in June, and was next in evidence at Tanana,. Alaska, in July, 1915. He was later arrested and put on trial for the offenses of which he was convicted.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harlan v. McGourinSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Glasgow v. MoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Ex Parte SpencerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Kaizo v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Davey v. OwenOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Whitney v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. McMahan v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. Mack Kitchens, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  5. McIntosh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API