Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1948No. 16182PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Presiding Justice.

1. Disregarding the question whether or not an exception to a dismissal of a plea in abatement, alleging relationship within the sixth degree between two grand jurors and two witnesses, respectively, before the grand jury which returned the present indictment, one of which witnesses was alleged to be in fact the .prosecutor, may, as was done in the present case, be made a special ground of a motion for new trial — the plea, urging a disqualification which was one propter affectum, was not maintainable. Bitting v. State, 165 Ga. 55 (139 S. E. 877); Farrar v. State,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bitting v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Farrar v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Overby v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Pace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API