Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 2, 2014No. S13G1612Published

1ConcurrenceBlackwell, Justice

It is no ground for a plea in abatement that a true bill of indictment was returned by grand jurors disqualified propter affectum, and this settled principle has been a part of our common law for more than a century. See, e.g., Fisher v. State, 93 Ga. 309, 309-310 (20 SE 329) (1893); Lascelles v. State, 90 Ga. 347, 372-375 (3) (16 SE 945) (1892); Williams v. State, 69 Ga. 11, 27-28 (5) (1882); Betts v. State, 66 Ga. 508, 514-515 (6) (1881); Garnett v. State, 10 Ga. App. 109, 111-112 (1) (72 SE 951) (1911); Hall v. State, 7 Ga. App. 115, 116-118 (1) (66 SE 390) (1909). Through the years, our…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Deal v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Lascelles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  4. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Robeson v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API