Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Markdale Corp. v. Board of Appeals

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1965PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

While other issues are raised in the briefs, we deem the following two are determinative of this appeal :(1) Does self-created hardship afford a sufficient statutory basis for a board of zoning appeals granting a variance ?(2) Do the facts in the instant case establish beyond dispute that the hardship relied upon for the variance was self-created ?

Sec. 62.23 (7) (e) 7, Stats., provides in part as follows:

“The board of appeals shall have the following powers: ... to authorize upon appeal in specific cases such variance from the terms of the ordinance as will not be contrary to the public…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State ex rel. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Board of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State ex rel. Tingley v. GurdaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Deardorf v. Board of Adjustment of Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. Outagamie County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. James N. Barbian and Joan L. Barbian v. Constantine Panagis and the City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Stansbury v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Puritan-Greenfield Improvement Ass'n v. LeoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API