Legal Opinion

Solernou v. Solernou

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 19, 1989No. 89-2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The former wife appeals several post-dissolution rulings by the trial court.

The trial court correctly concluded that the former wife’s motion for recusal was legally insufficient and that the motion for rehearing was untimely. No reversible error has been shown with respect to the denial of the motion for contempt. The application for an order of indigency is moot with respect to this court’s filing fee. However, insofar as other taxable costs of this appeal are concerned, if any, we provisionally grant an award of costs to the wife, subject to the trial court’s conducting an evidentiary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sierra v. SierraSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Thornton v. ThorntonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Randall v. RandallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API