Legal Opinion
People v. Trujillo
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 2, 2006No. 05SA318PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid
In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, we review the trial court’s order requiring Petitioner Cassandra Gomez’s criminal defense counsel to produce portions of his case file for in camera review. The trial court based its ruling on its belief that Gomez impliedly waived the attorney-client privilege when she entered into a plea agreement. We issued a rule to show cause. Because we find that no implied waiver took place, we now make the rule absolute.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 8, 2003, an employee of an armored vehicle company was assaulted and robbed after picking up…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hunt v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wesp v. EversonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Lanari v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Losavio v. District Court in & for Tenth Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. BergerudSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Browne v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- DCP Midstream, LP v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- People v. TuckerColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.