Legal Opinion

Berger v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 1954PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to declare unconstitutional a zoning ordinance insofar as it restricts the use of plaintiff's property to residential purposes, defendants appeal from a judgment, rendered after trial, adjudging the ordinance to be unconstitutional. Judgment reversed on the law and on the facts, without costs, and judgment directed to be entered dismissing the complaint on the merits, without costs. Whether plaintiff’s property is suitable for a conforming use is fairly debatable. Under such circumstances the judgment of the local legislative body must be allowed to prevail. (Shepard v. Village…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Shepard v. Village of SkaneatelesNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Matter of Levy v. Bd. of Standards AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Kraft v. Village of Hastings-on-HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kraushaar & Son, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API