United States v. Document Reprocessors of New York, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK __________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. QUINTIN J. SCHWARTZ, SR., Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER v. 20-cv-6167 EAW DOCUMENT REPROCESSORS OF NEW YORK, INC., ERIC LUNDQUIST, and MURIEL LUNDQUIST, Defendants. ____________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Plaintiff-Relator Quintin J. Schwartz, Sr. (“Relator”) alleges a claim under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act,
31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732
(the “FCA”). (Dkt. 34). In the amended complaint, which is the operative pleading, Relator…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Turkmen v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Trustees of the Upstate New York Engineers Pension Fund v. Ivy Asset ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.