Legal Opinion

United States v. Document Reprocessors of New York, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 19, 2023No. 6:20-cv-06167Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK __________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. QUINTIN J. SCHWARTZ, SR., Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER v. 20-cv-6167 EAW DOCUMENT REPROCESSORS OF NEW YORK, INC., ERIC LUNDQUIST, and MURIEL LUNDQUIST, Defendants. ____________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Plaintiff-Relator Quintin J. Schwartz, Sr. (“Relator”) alleges a claim under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act,

31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732

(the “FCA”). (Dkt. 34). In the amended complaint, which is the operative pleading, Relator…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Turkmen v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Trustees of the Upstate New York Engineers Pension Fund v. Ivy Asset ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API