Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mahoney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 7, 1990PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

A grand jury returned indictments against the defendants, Matthew Mahoney and James Santos, and a third man, Douglas Drager, charging them with the murder of Kirk Nilsen. The indictment against Drager was severed from those against the defendants, and the defendants’ respective motions for severance from each other were denied. The indictments were put to trial before a jury in the Superior Court. At the conclusion of the Commonwealth’s evidence, the judge allowed the defendants’ motions for the entry of required findings of not guilty on so much of the indictments as charged murder. The jury…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. FancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. PeruzziMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AvilaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. Pytou HeangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Adoption of HugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. DrumgoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API