Legal Opinion

Flax v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 10, 1992No. Civ. 91-2807PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHESLER, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of defendant United States of America for summary judgment and/or to dismiss the complaint. In accordance with the provisions of section 636(c) of Title 28 of the United States Code, the parties have consented to have this motion tried before the undersigned. By Order dated December 20, 1991, all proceedings with regard to this matter were referred to the undersigned for disposition. Oral argument was heard on March 23, 1992.

II. BACKGROUND

In this action brought under the Federal Tort…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flax v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  2. Flax (Marilyn), Estate of Flax (Irving) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API