Legal Opinion
Doe v. South Carolina State Budget & Control Board
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 22, 1999No. 25020PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Doe v. South Carolina Budget and Control Bd., 329 S.C. 214, 494 S.E.2d 469 (Ct.App.1997). We affirm.
Petitioners brought a declaratory judgment action to determine whether sexual assaults committed against them by Tega Cay Police Officer Roberson were covered under two separate insurance policies, an automobile liability policy and a general tort liability policy. The circuit court granted respondent’s summary judgment motion, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Doe, supra.
Each petitioner was stopped by Roberson at night on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. AytesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Doe v. SC STATE BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARDCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
3Cited by13 opinions
- Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Ben Arnold-Sunbelt Beverage Company Of South Carolina, LpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Nathan D. Alexander, Ii, and Amy Gepfert v. Joseph DeangeloCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Frazier v. BadgerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Peagler Ex Rel. Estate of Thompson v. USAA InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Loadholt v. South Carolina State Budget & Control BoardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.