Legal Opinion
Esther Saravia v. 1736 18th Street, N.W., Limited Partnership
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 8, 1988No. 87-7114PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Appellant is a limited partnership. Its sole asset is a rental apartment building located in the District of Columbia. Acquired by the partnership in March 1988, the property consists of 24 apartment units. Currently, only a handful of the units are occupied, the rest having been left unrented as their tenants vacated the premises. The combination of low rents and low occupancy levels resulted in the building becoming uneconomical to maintain. Expenses soon began to outstrip rental income; the costs of providing essential utilities — for example, water…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In re Saco Local Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Riggsby v. RiggsbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by27 opinions
- Hillis Motors, Inc. v. Hawaii Automobile Dealers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Robinson v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Wealth Management LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- In Re Old Carco LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- 1993-1 Trade Cases P 70,285, 29 Collier bankr.cas.2d 470, Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,331 Hillis Motors, Inc., and Dallas Edward Rowley v. Hawaii Automobile Dealers' AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.