Legal Opinion

Way v. Way

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1872PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

The solution of one “question against the complainant disposes effectually of this case, and, therefore, we shall not enter upon a discussion of the numerous errors assigned.

The bill commences as follows: “Your orator, of the city of Chicago, Cook count)”, Illinois,” and subsequently alleges that the complainant is an actual resident of this State. We shall not question these allegations to be a substantial compliance with the requirement of the statute, that proceedings for a divorce shall be had in the county where the complainant resides. "

The bill further charges that the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frost & Dickinson v. BrisbinNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. In re WrigleyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
  3. Moore v. CableNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  4. Board of Supervisors v. DavenportIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Peeples v. PeeplesIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Dunham v. DunhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People Ex Rel. Carlstrom v. ShurtleffIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Caswell v. CaswellIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Reifschneider v. ReifschneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Leland v. LelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API