Failing v. Failing
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily
This appeal stems from a separate maintenance proceeding commenced in the circuit court of Cook County by appellee, Fay M. Failing, against her husband, Charles K. Failing, the appellant. The issue presented is whether the trial court had jurisdiction, within the State and Federal concepts of due process of law,' to subject real property of appellant to a decree in rem. We have held such an issue as presented here to be a sufficient basis for a direct appeal. Gleiser v. Gleiser, 402 Ill. 343; VanDyke v. Illinois Commercial Men’s Assn. 358 Ill. 458.
Among other things, appellee’s complaint…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bickerdike v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Wesner v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Reed v. ReedOhio Supreme Court · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hodge v. HodgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Sarah S. Wagner v. Charles A. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Hill v. MeisterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Rowie v. Evanston Community Consolidated School District 65Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Profitt v. Onebeacon insuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.