Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Election Commission of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1933No. Calendar 36,986, 36,992PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

These two mandamus cases were consolidated and heard together and will be so disposed of. Both are brought to compel action by the board of election commissioners of the city of Detroit. The first by Lillian Doyle who was denied, by defendants, the right to file her petitions for nomination for judge of the court of common pleas of Detroit for a term commencing immediately after the election and ending July 3, 1935, on the ground that Act No. 332, Pub. Acts 1931, is unconstitutional so far as it attempts to extend the term of office of the judges of the court of common pleas for a period of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Common Council v. SchmidMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Kates v. ReadingMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority v. Boards of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. City of Hazel Park v. Municipal Finance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Connor v. HerrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Simonton v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Boards of County Road Commissioners v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API