Simonton v. City of Pontiac
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
On July 12, Í920, the electors of the city of Pontiac, Michigan, adopted a home rule charter in conformity with the provisions of article 8, §§ 20, 21, of the Constitution of the State of Michigan, and Act No. 279, Pub. Acts 1909, as amended (1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 2228-2274). On November 28, 1933, the city manager submitted' to the city commission, which governs the city, a proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 1934. In accordance with the provisions of Act No. 273, Pub. Acts 1925, 1 Comp. Laws, 1929, § 2694, as amended by Act No. 142, Pub. Acts 1931, he included the sum of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Thompson v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Harsha v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Kalamazoo v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Clements v. McCabeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Hazel Park v. Municipal Finance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc v. City of HamtramckMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Council of Saginaw v. Saginaw Policemen & Firemen Retirement System TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Jackson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Municipal Finance Commission v. Marquette Township School District Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.