Legal Opinion

Blair & Hughes Co. v. Short

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1925No. 3031PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the appellant’s suit for want of prosecution. The record shows that in December, 1918, appellant, a private corporation, filed suit in the court below against U. F. Short, alleging, in substance, that during the pendency of a former suit between the appellant and other parties, Short became the custodian of certain funds, amounting to $600, which were to be paid over to the successful party in that controversy; that the appellant was the successful party, and after judgment demanded possession of the funds. Short refused, and this suit followed. It…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eddleman v. McGlatheryTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. M. Cohen v. Minor MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Wood v. CahillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Short v. Blair & Hughes Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Eggenberger v. BrandenbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waggoner v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Humphreys v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Williams v. FuerstenbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Waggoner v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API