Legal Opinion
Short v. Blair & Hughes Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 19, 1921No. 8499PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; E. B. Muse, Judge. Suit by the Blair & Hughes Company against U. E. Short. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.
The appellee, Blair & Hughes Company, a private corporation, brought this suit against the appellant, U. F. Short, on an alleged cause of action, as follows:
“That prior to May 8, 1916, Hardy Buggy Company instituted a suit in the Forty-Fourth judicial district court of Dallas county, Tex., styled Hardy Buggy Company v. Pinckard & Sanders et al„ and numbered 15811-B on the docket thereof, in which said suit-Hardy Buggy Company sought to foreclose a mortgage lien on certain buggies alleged to belong to the defendants, Pinckard & Sanders et al.; that Blair & Hughes Company intervened in said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Electric Express & Baggage Co. v. AblonTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Kelly v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- People ex rel. Meminger v. SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Hardy Buggy Co. v. Pinckard & SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
3Cited by13 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Davis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- First State Bank of Loraine v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Perkins v. LightfootCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Permian Oil Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.