Legal Opinion

Holloway v. School District No. Nine

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Lenawee. (Howell, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The fact» are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for a balance of wages as teacher, his contract, as he claims, being for $104, and the amount paid him being $52.

*155A preliminary question was raised concerning jurisdiction. The case was begun before a justice upon a summons, which4' laid the damages within the sum authorized for his jurisdiction. The special count in the declaration was for the sum due under the contract, but the common counts laid damages at $500. No objection was made before the justice, and he gave judgment on the merits. In the circuit court no objection was made until the trial had progressed,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. School District No. 4 v. GageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Eureka Iron & Steel Works v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Crane v. School District Number SixMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Everett v. Fractional School District No. 2Michigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vincent v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. Graham v. School DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hermance v. Public School District No. 2Arizona Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Bryan v. Fractional School District No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Armstrong v. School District No. 3Missouri Court of Appeals · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API