Legal Opinion

Mintz v. Ladendorf

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1929No. Docket No. 147, Calendar No. 34,150PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant in assumpsit in justice’s court. The summons issued was re turned unserved. An alias summons was issued and returned with proof of inability to find defendant within the jurisdiction of the court and of substituted service by leaving a copy of the summons at defendant’s last place of abode within the county, in the presence of a member of defendant’s family of suitable age and discretion, who was informed of its contents. Defendant did not appear before the justice of the peace on the return day of the alias summons, and after waiting one hour, the case was called by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campau v. CharbeneauMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Harbour v. EldredMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Vliet v. WestenhaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Frank v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wise v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Felice v. FeliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Kerchieff v. CopeningMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API