Wille v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County
1Opinion of the Court
Ervin, J.,
Plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit, based on a health and accident policy issued by defendant company. He recovered a verdict in the sum of $459.86. Defendant has filed motions for new trial and judgment n. o. v. The motion for new trial must be dismissed but defendant is entitled to judgment n. o. v. for a portion of the verdict, and judgment will be entered for plaintiff for the remainder.
The contract of insurance provides, inter alia, as follows:
*94“The defendant insures the plaintiff against loss resulting independently and exclusively of all other causes from accidental…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wrobel v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- United States Casualty Co. v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Losnecki v. Mutual L. Ins. Co. of N. Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Farner v. Massachusetts Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Hoekstra v. HopkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.